Rikos v. Procter & Gamble Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the same for purchasers of digestive food supplements, which defendants allegedly falsely advertised as having certain health benefits
• \Courts have interpreted section 337(a) as prohibiting private rights of action under the FDCA and dismissed state law claims that seek to enforce the FDCA or its regulations\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).