Rikos v. Procter & Gamble Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the same for purchasers of digestive food supplements, which defendants allegedly falsely advertised as having certain health benefits
• \Courts have interpreted section 337(a) as prohibiting private rights of action under the FDCA and dismissed state law claims that seek to enforce the FDCA or its regulations\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Ferrero Litigation
  S.D. California· 2011-06-30· cited 28×
• In re Horizon Organic Milk Plus Dha Omega-3 Marketing & Sales Practice Litigation
  S.D. Florida· 2013-07-24· cited 25×
• Garcia v. Kashi Co.
  S.D. Florida· 2014-09-05· cited 22×
• In Re Hydroxycut Marketing & Sales Practices Lit.
  S.D. California· 2011-05-31· cited 13×
• In re Trader Joe's Tuna Litig.
  C.D. California· 2017-10-03· cited 8×
• Regan v. Sioux Honey Ass'n Cooperative
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2013-01-31· cited 4×
• Dremak v. Iovate Health Sciences Group, Inc.
  S.D. California· 2011-05-31· cited 1×

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2000-01-12· cited 6,373×
• United States v. Western Pacific Railroad
  Supreme Court· 1956-12-03· cited 1,533×
• Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1999-04-08· cited 1,311×
• Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USA
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-01-31· cited 1,078×
• Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-06-08· cited 1,018×
• Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 2011-01-27· cited 891×
• Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
  California Supreme Court· 2003-03-03· cited 855×
• In Re Tobacco II Cases
  California Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 705×
• Williams v. Gerber Products Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-12-22· cited 582×
• Bly-Magee v. California
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-01-02· cited 485×
• Michael T. Moir v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 268
  Sixth Circuit· 1990-02-06· cited 461×
• James H. ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRATTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Fred S. Almy, and D.E. Stolberg, Defendants-Appellees
  Sixth Circuit· 1986-08-21· cited 424×
• Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.
  California Supreme Court· 1972-05-10· cited 404×
• Hazel Golden v. City of Columbus Cheryl Roberto, Director of Public Utilities for the City of Columbus
  Sixth Circuit· 2005-04-18· cited 356×
• Hodgers-Durgin v. De La Vina
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-12-21· cited 293×
• Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1999-01-04· cited 235×
• Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2009-03-10· cited 197×
• Courie v. Alcoa Wheel & Forged Products
  Sixth Circuit· 2009-08-18· cited 163×