Serrano v. 180 Connect, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that CAFA exceptions are nonjuris-dictional because they “require federal courts—although they have jurisdiction ... to ‘decline to exercise jurisdiction’ when” CAFA’s threshold requirements are met
• “We are not persuaded by Lao’s reasoning because it is inconsistent with the statute.”
• “[U]nder CAFA, complete diversity is not required; ‘minimal diversity’ suffices”
• describing 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(4)(A) & (B)
• addressing the “home-state controversy” CAFA exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).