Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 2/22/2007

Serrano v. 180 Connect, Inc.

Citations

  • 478 F.3d 1018
  • 12 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 584
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 3818
  • 2007 WL 601984

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a district court erred by not placing the burden to prove an exception to CAFA on the party claiming the exception
  • holding that the proponent of federal jurisdiction bears the burden of proving jurisdiction
  • holding that the proponent of federal jurisdiction bears the burden of proving jurisdiction
  • holding that the proponent of federal jurisdiction bears the burden of proving jurisdiction
  • explaining that “[i]mplicit in both subsections (d)(3) and (d)(4) is that the court has jurisdiction”
  • holding district court \shall decline to exercise jurisdiction over a class action in which the plaintiff class and at least one defendant meet certain characteristics that essentially make the case a local controversy\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clifford, Cudahy, Margaret, McKEOWN, Richard, Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Serrano v. 180 Connect, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.