Skip to main content

Peoples v. State

Citations

  • 612 So. 2d 555
  • 1992 WL 348330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that once police grant immunity and arrange for and conduct monitoring and taping of a defendant through an informant who voluntarily approached the police, the information is no longer passively obtained
  • although a defendant’s jail-mate approached police on his own accord, recorded statements violated defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights because the state granted the cellmate immunity and “otherwise arranged for and conducted the clandestine monitoring and taping”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.