Supreme Court· 11/8/1880
People's Bank v. Calhoun
Citations
- 102 U.S. 256
- 26 L. Ed. 101
- 1880 U.S. LEXIS 2033
- 12 Otto 256
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he mere consent of parties cannot confer upon a court of the United States the jurisdiction to hear and decide a case.”
- “It needs no citation of authorities to show that the mere consent of parties cannot confer upon a court of the United States the jurisdiction to hear and decide a case.”
- “It needs no citation of authorities to show that the mere consent of parties cannot confer upon a court of the United States the jurisdiction to hear and decide a case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 1,936×
- Wisconsin Department of Corrections v. SchachtSupreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 1,341×
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court· 1951-04-09· cited 1,278×
- Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 1,048×
- Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court· 1935-02-04· cited 385×
- Unnamed caseEleventh Circuit· 1982-06-17· cited 373×
- Porter v. SabinSupreme Court· 1893-05-15· cited 234×
- Gosa v. MaydenSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 228×
- Heidritter v. Elizabeth Oil-Cloth Co.Supreme Court· 1884-11-24· cited 142×
- Cross-Sound Ferry Services, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, and Viking Starship, Inc., IntervenorD.C. Circuit· 1991-05-10· cited 58×
- P. F. C. Daniel E. Pitcher v. Melvin Laird, as Secretary of Defenses.Fifth Circuit· 1970-01-30· cited 49×
- Barnette v. Wells Fargo Nevada National BankSupreme Court· 1926-04-12· cited 47×
- Ralph P. Eagerton, Etc. v. Valuations, Inc., and United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyEleventh Circuit· 1983-02-22· cited 47×
- James Sahagun v. Landmark Fence Co.Ninth Circuit· 2015-09-11· cited 24×
- Page Plus of Atlanta, Inc. v. Owl Wireless, LLCSixth Circuit· 2013-10-28· cited 23×
- Simmons v. California, Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Labor Standards EnforcementE.D. California· 1990-06-20· cited 23×
- Siding and Insulation Co. v. Acuity Mutual Ins. Co.Sixth Circuit· 2014-06-10· cited 23×
- Cunard S. S. Co. v. SmithSecond Circuit· 1918-12-11· cited 23×
- Klein v. PeterEighth Circuit· 1922-11-02· cited 22×
- Hitz v. JenksSupreme Court· 1902-04-07· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.