Hitz v. Jenks
Citations
- 185 U.S. 155
- 22 S. Ct. 598
- 46 L. Ed. 851
- 1902 U.S. LEXIS 2250
Syllabus
<p>The property involved in this suit is improved real estate in the city of Washington; and the controlling question presented is, whether the sale of it under a deed of trust stands in the way of its redemption by Mrs. Hitz upon h.er paying the debt secured by the deed of trust.</p> <p>As between the parties to the original cause the title to the real estate in question was bound for the filing of the cross-bill by Mrs. Hitz.</p> <p>The deeds which Mrs. Hitz sought to have set aside are valid and enforceable instruments.</p> <p>The sale by Tyler as trustee conferred no title as against Mrs. Hitz.</p> <p>Mrs. Hitz is entitled in this suit-to redeem the property by paying such sum as may be due on account of the debt to secure which the deed to Tyler was made.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[a]s receiver he held the property for the court and for the benefit of all the parties asserting an interest in it”
- interpreting District of Columbia law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harlan, Brewer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Austin v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1900-12-03· cited 156×
- Mississippi Valley Trust Co. v. Railway Steel Spring Co.Eighth Circuit· 1919-04-19· cited 15×
- Field v. Kansas City Refining Co.Eighth Circuit· 1924-02-29· cited 13×
- Blumenfeld v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia· 1929-03-14· cited 11×
- Taylor v. SS Helen LykesE.D. Louisiana· 1967-05-08· cited 10×
- Cohen v. NixonS.D. Georgia· 1916-09-30· cited 8×
- Knott v. Evening Post Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky· 1903-07-20· cited 8×
- Ebert v. Blackmax Downhole Tools, Inc. (In Re Gibraltar Resources, Inc.)N.D. Texas· 1996-04-17· cited 7×
- Grosscup v. German Savings & Loan SocietyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon· 1908-06-08· cited 7×
- Jarvis v. Technical Land, Inc. (In Re Technical Land, Inc.)District of Columbia· 1994-12-30· cited 4×
- Jarvis v. Technical Land, Inc. (In Re Technical Land, Inc.)District of Columbia· 1994-06-01· cited 4×
- Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.Fifth Circuit· 1935-03-15· cited 4×
- Modart, Inc. v. Penrose Industries Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1967-09-20· cited 4×
- Cherry v. Insull Utility Investments, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1932-05-28· cited 3×
- Slade v. Massachusetts Coal & Power Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts· 1911-05-04· cited 3×
- Collier v. GormleySupreme Court of Georgia· 1933-12-29· cited 2×
- In re Domum Locis LLCC.D. California· 2014-12-05· cited 2×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Heidritter v. Elizabeth Oil-Cloth Co.Supreme Court· 1884-11-24· cited 142×
- People's Bank v. CalhounSupreme Court· 1880-11-08· cited 97×
- Ellis v. Vernon Ice, Light, & Water Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1893-10-26· cited 63×
- Walling v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals· 1888-01-17· cited 58×
- United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court· 1902-03-03· cited 50×
- Hitz v. JenksSupreme Court· 1887-11-14· cited 29×
- Ridings v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1888-11-19· cited 27×
- Porter v. KingmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1879-01-04· cited 14×
- Dugger v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama· 1881-12-15· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.