People v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant, who was a passenger in a vehicle during an inventory search by a government agent, did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the vehicle, but did have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the closed suitcase he owned and stored in the trunk
• defendant was a passenger in a car that the legitimate owner was driving
• passenger in a vehicle during an inventory search by a government agent, did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the vehicle, but did have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his closed suitcase that was stored in the trunk

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Nash
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-03-31· cited 15×
• People v. Sotelo
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2014-10-14· cited 9×
• State v. Pinheiro
  Superior Court of Rhode Island· 2011-03-22

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rakas v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
• Smith v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 2,305×
• United States v. Edwards
  Tenth Circuit· 2001-03-09· cited 92×
• People v. Sparks
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-08-03· cited 51×
• People v. Hundley
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1993-08-26· cited 33×
• People v. Juarbe
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-01-12· cited 24×
• People v. Taylor
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-06-03· cited 22×
• People v. Centeno
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-08-14· cited 17×
• People v. Manke
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-04-03· cited 14×