Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/8/2005

People v. Prince

Citations

362 Ill. App. 3d 762
298 Ill. Dec. 805
840 N.E.2d 1240
2005 Ill. App. LEXIS 1203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that the erroneous admission of hearsay evidence was subject to harmless error analysis
finding that the erroneous admission of hearsay evidence was subject to harmless error analysis
improper for fingerprint examiner to testify that her work was peer reviewed and verified by another researcher
the trial court need not accord greater weight to the potential for rehabilitation than to other sentencing factors
forensic biologist testified that she analyzed floor mats and found presence of blood; two more forensic biologists testified they tested samples from same floor mats and arrived at same conclusion on origin of blood

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.