Skip to main content

People v. Wilson

Citations

  • 824 N.E.2d 191
  • 214 Ill. 2d 127
  • 291 Ill. Dec. 615
  • 2005 Ill. LEXIS 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “modus operandi refers to a pattern of criminal behavior so distinctive that separate crimes are recognized as the handiwork of the same person”
  • declining to address whether other-crimes evidence can ever be used to show intent where the defendant does not place intent at issue
  • evidence that teacher previously touched other students in similar manner properly admitted to show lack of mistake in prosecution for aggravated criminal sexual abuse of students
  • aggravated criminal sexual abuse is a specific intent crime and defendant’s intent is at issue where he denied committing the crime
  • “the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the probative value of the [other-crimes evidence] outweighed any undue prejudice to defendant”
  • “modus operandi refers to a pattern of criminal behavior so distinctive that separate crimes are recognized as the handiwork of the same person”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Kilbride, Karmeier, Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.