Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Seiders

Citations

  • 614 A.2d 689
  • 531 Pa. 592
  • 1992 Pa. LEXIS 452

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding in part that intent was not an issue in the case because intent was not an element of the offense for which defendant was charged
  • holding in part that intent was not an issue in the case because intent was not an element of the offense for which defendant was charged
  • holding in part that intent was not an issue in the case because intent was not an element of the offense for which defendant was charged
  • awarding the defendant a new trial where the defendant's previous sexual assault convictions were admitted in his trial for sexual assault and no exception permitting the introduction of such evidence applied
  • awarding the defendant a new trial where the defendant’s previous sexual assault convictions were admitted in his trial for sexual assault and no exception permitting the introduction of such evidence applied
  • awarding the defendant a new trial where the defendant’s previous sexual assault convictions were admitted in his trial for sexual assault and - 26 - J-S54034-17 no exception permitting the introduction of such evidence applied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.