Appellate Court of Illinois· 6/20/2002

People v. Deenadayalu

Citations

772 N.E.2d 323
331 Ill. App. 3d 442
265 Ill. Dec. 285
2002 Ill. App. LEXIS 619

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“when other-crimes evidence is introduced for a limited purpose, it is presumed that the trial judge considered it only for that purpose” (citation omitted)
“when other-crimes evidence is introduced for a limited purpose, it is presumed that the trial judge considered it only for that purpose” (citation omitted)
other-crimes evidence is relevant in a specific-intent sexual assault prosecution to prove defendant’s intent or lack of an innocent frame of mind, distinguishing other cases to the contrary on the basis that those cases involved child victims
other-crimes evidence is relevant in a specific-intent sexual assault prosecution to prove defendant's intent or lack of an innocent frame of mind, distinguishing other cases to the contrary on the basis that those cases involved child victims
other-crimes evidence is relevant in a specific-intent sexual assault prosecution to prove defendant’s intent or lack of an innocent frame of mind, distinguishing other cases to the contrary on the basis that those cases involved child victims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Geiger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.