Illinois Supreme Court· 6/3/2005
People v. Willis
Citations
- 831 N.E.2d 531
- 215 Ill. 2d 517
- 294 Ill. Dec. 581
- 2005 Ill. LEXIS 944
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “an extraordinarily long delay which itself raises the inference of police misconduct could, at some point, render any confession involuntary”
- holding that a trial court facing a Gerstein/McLaughlin violation asks the question whether the confession was voluntary
- holding that a trial court facing a Gerstein/McLaughlin violation asks the question whether the confession was voluntary
- defendant’s confession was voluntary even though he was held in detention for 73 hours prior to confessing
- “When faced with a GersteinlMcLaughlin violation, we ask simply whether the confession was voluntary”
- exclusionary rule not applied where detention ran afoul of Gerstein, but confession voluntary
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fitzgerald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. SutherlandIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-12-04· cited 465×
- People v. NicholasIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-01-23· cited 260×
- People v. LopezIllinois Supreme Court· 2008-06-19· cited 184×
- People v. SlaterIllinois Supreme Court· 2008-03-20· cited 169×
- People v. HariIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-01-20· cited 96×
- People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois· 2014-05-14· cited 88×
- People v. MinnitiAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-04-30· cited 45×
- People v. WoodardAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-09-20· cited 42×
- People v.SalamonIllinois Supreme Court· 2022-04-21· cited 42×
- People v. BennettAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-09-12· cited 30×
- People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-05-22· cited 23×
- People v. DeloneyAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-08-11· cited 19×
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-11-20· cited 19×
- People v. GalanIllinois Supreme Court· 2008-07-24· cited 18×
- People v. MitchellAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-08-05· cited 15×
- People v. MacIasAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-02-16· cited 12×
- People v. MitchellAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-08-04· cited 10×
- People v. MandolineAppellate Court of Illinois· 2017-05-01· cited 9×
- People v. SanchezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-12-15· cited 8×
- People v. RubioAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-07-06· cited 7×
Cites
70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 4,350×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 3,633×
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court· 1974-01-08· cited 3,415×
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-06-07· cited 2,030×
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 1,662×
- County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 1,546×
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 1,453×
- Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 1,364×
- Arizona v. EvansSupreme Court· 1995-03-01· cited 885×
- United States v. PaynerSupreme Court· 1980-08-11· cited 785×
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 588×
- People v. TislerIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-09-20· cited 446×
- The People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court· 1965-11-19· cited 429×
- People v. GilliamIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-05-23· cited 328×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.