Skip to main content

People v. Williams

Citations

  • 409 N.E.2d 439
  • 87 Ill. App. 3d 860
  • 42 Ill. Dec. 824
  • 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 3495

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the trial court could not reject the uncontradicted expert conclusions that defendant was unfit solely on the basis of the trial court’s brief and casual exposure to defendant or the court’s “ ‘common sense’ ” interpretation of the psychiatric opinions
  • the trial court could not reject the uncontradicted expert conclusions that defendant was unfit solely on the basis of the trial court's brief and casual exposure to defendant or the court's \ 'common sense' \ interpretation of the psychiatric opinions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woodward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.