Skip to main content
· 11/30/1973

People v. Skorusa

Citations

  • 304 N.E.2d 630
  • 55 Ill. 2d 577
  • 1973 Ill. LEXIS 295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting defense counsel’s request for a psychiatric examination does not raise a bona fide doubt
  • granting defense counsel's request for a psychiatric examination does not raise a bona fide doubt
  • it is permissible for a prosecutor to comment on the uncontradicted nature of the State’s case even where the only person who could have contradicted the State’s evidence was the defendant himself
  • it is permissible for a prosecutor to comment on the uncontradicted nature of the State's case even where the only person who could have contradicted the State's evidence was the defendant himself
  • it is permissible for a prosecutor to comment on the uncontradicted nature of the State's case even where the only person who could have contradicted the State's evidence was the defendant himself
  • although defendant objected to certain remarks during closing argument which were intended to call attention to the defendant’s failure to testify, other portions of the argument commenting on his failure to testify were waived by the failure to make a timely objection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William J. Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.