New York Supreme Court· 2/15/1827
People v. Whaley
Citations
- 6 Cow. 661
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remarking that the jury found that the defendant accepted payment “with the corrupt intent charged in the indictment”
- remarking that the jury found that the defendant accepted payment \with the corrupt intent charged in the indictment\
- affirming the extortion conviction of a justice of the peace who had charged a litigant a court fee when none was due
- affirming the extortion conviction of a justice of the peace who had charged a litigant a court fee when none was due
- “Extortion signifies, in an enlarged sense, any oppression under color of right. In a stricter sense, it signifies the taking of money by any officer, by color of his office; either, where none at all is due, or not so much due, or when it is not yet due”
- justice of the peace properly indicted for extorting money
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Savage
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wilkie v. RobbinsSupreme Court· 2007-06-25· cited 682×
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-05-26· cited 423×
- McCormick v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 268×
- Sekhar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-06-26· cited 178×
- United States v. Katherine Bordallo AguonNinth Circuit· 1988-07-01· cited 123×
- United States v. Frank MazzeiThird Circuit· 1975-07-29· cited 118×
- United States v. R. C. FrenchEighth Circuit· 1980-11-03· cited 39×
- United States v. ManzoThird Circuit· 2011-02-17· cited 17×
- Cutter v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1873-02-15· cited 9×
- Ogden v. MaxwellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1855-10-15· cited 8×
- State v. StottsIndiana Supreme Court· 1840-12-04· cited 6×
- State v. OdenIndiana Court of Appeals· 1894-05-29· cited 2×
- Hedden v. IselinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1887-06-28· cited 1×
- United States v. RenziD. Arizona· 2012-03-21
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.