State v. Stotts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the extortion conviction of a constable who had charged a greater fee than was due for performance of his services
• affirming the extortion conviction of a constable who had charged a greater fee than was due for performance of his services

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Evans v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1992-05-26· cited 423×
• State v. Oden
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1894-05-29· cited 2×
• Hedden v. Iselin
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1887-06-28· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Whaley
  New York Supreme Court· 1827-02-15· cited 23×
• Horne v. Barney
  New York Supreme Court· 1821-10-15· cited 4×