Supreme Court· 6/26/2013

Sekhar v. United States

Citations

133 S. Ct. 2720
186 L. Ed. 2d 794
2013 U.S. LEXIS 4920
570 U.S. 729
24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 468
81 U.S.L.W. 4628
2013 WL 3196929

Oral argument

Argued
59 min recording
Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding “property” does not include coercing someone to recommend an investment
explaining that “if a word is obviously transplanted 15Because the government is interpreting a provision of the INA, the Chevron framework applies. 60 from another legal source, whether the common law or other legislation, it brings the old soil with it”
citing, inter alia, F. Wharton, Wharton’s Criminal Law § 178 at 296 (C. Torcia 14th ed. 1979)
stating that Congress “did not define” the relevant terms
declining to adopt an interpretation of a statute where “it would collapse the longstanding distinction between [forms of conduct] and - 32 - ignore [the legislature]’s choice to penalize one but not the other”
requiring the “absentee of] other indication” for the presumption to apply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scalia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

117 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Sekhar v. United States

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.