Skip to main content

People v. King

Citations

  • 544 N.W.2d 765
  • 215 Mich. App. 301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not err in denying a mistrial where wearing the three-inch diameter buttons was ordered stopped by the trial court on what was likely the only day they were worn
  • concluding without factual detail that evidence of the victim’s statements regarding her fears in a first-degree murder trial were admissible pursuant to MRE 803(3) where they were relevant to the way the victim behaved at the time of her murder and the prosecution’s theory of the case
  • the defendant’s position that the decedent’s state of mind must itself be at issue was not the approach taken by our Supreme Court in Fisher, supra
  • The defendant's position that the decedent's state of mind must itself be at issue was not the approach taken by our Supreme Court in Fisher, supra

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michael J. Kelly, P.J., and Reilly and E. Sosnick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.