Skip to main content

People v. Thomas

Citations

  • 50 N.Y.2d 467
  • 407 N.E.2d 430
  • 429 N.Y.S.2d 584
  • 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2391

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the charge condemned in Sandstrom has been held by this court [ ] to be erroneous” for more than a century
  • noting that, in many instances, constitutional rights are waived if not preserved
  • stating that one must object to charge or objection is waived
  • stating general rule that objection at trial is required to preserve issue for appeal
  • applying the contemporaneous objection rule to alleged Sandstrom errors
  • applying the contemporaneous objection rule to alleged Sandstrom errors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fuchsberg, Wachtler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

420 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.