Skip to main content
· 9/12/1986

Vito Matarese v. Eugene Lefevre, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, and Robert Abrams, Attorney General, State of New York

Citations

  • 801 F.2d 98
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 30930

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, while relief is appropriate in “extraordinary circumstances” or “where the judgment may work an extreme and undue hardship,” Rule 60(b)(6) “may not be used as a substitute for appeal”
  • holding habeas proceedings have no “conventional notions of finality”
  • denying relief where subsequent Supreme Court decisions indicated that change in law had not, in fact, occurred
  • reviewing Rule 60(b)(6) decisions for abuse of discretion only
  • reviewing Rule 60(b)(6) decisions for abuse of discretion only

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Newman, Van Graafeiland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.