· 9/12/1986
Vito Matarese v. Eugene Lefevre, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, and Robert Abrams, Attorney General, State of New York
Citations
- 801 F.2d 98
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 30930
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, while relief is appropriate in “extraordinary circumstances” or “where the judgment may work an extreme and undue hardship,” Rule 60(b)(6) “may not be used as a substitute for appeal”
- holding habeas proceedings have no “conventional notions of finality”
- denying relief where subsequent Supreme Court decisions indicated that change in law had not, in fact, occurred
- reviewing Rule 60(b)(6) decisions for abuse of discretion only
- reviewing Rule 60(b)(6) decisions for abuse of discretion only
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kearse, Newman, Van Graafeiland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.