Skip to main content

Citations

  • 81 A.D.2d 22
  • 440 N.Y.S.2d 248
  • 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “the doctrine [of preservation of error] is perhaps more properly conceived as a method of ‘procedural default’, whereby the failure to raise a timely claim of error — whether the omission be intentional or inadvertent — consigns the objection to permanent repose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gulotta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

97 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.