Skip to main content
· 4/2/1990

People v. Tenneson

Citations

  • 788 P.2d 786
  • 1990 WL 25383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • articulating that the jury must address these four factors to properly exercise its function in a capital sentencing proceeding
  • “These considerations [of fairness] assume profoundly greater importance in the process of determining whether a person convicted of murder shall be sentenced to death.”
  • \These considerations [of fairness] assume profoundly greater importance in the process of determining whether a person convicted of murder shall be sentenced to death.\
  • there is a special need for reliability and certainty in capital sentencing decisions because the death penalty is uniquely severe and final
  • there is a special need for reliability and certainty in capital sentencing decisions because the death penalty is uniquely severe and final
  • “It is for the jury to decide whether the ‘facts’ that the defendant asserts in mitigation are true and, if so, whether they are to be regarded as mitigating factors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lohr, Erickson, Royira, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.