· 4/2/1990
People v. Tenneson
Citations
- 788 P.2d 786
- 1990 WL 25383
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- articulating that the jury must address these four factors to properly exercise its function in a capital sentencing proceeding
- “These considerations [of fairness] assume profoundly greater importance in the process of determining whether a person convicted of murder shall be sentenced to death.”
- \These considerations [of fairness] assume profoundly greater importance in the process of determining whether a person convicted of murder shall be sentenced to death.\
- there is a special need for reliability and certainty in capital sentencing decisions because the death penalty is uniquely severe and final
- there is a special need for reliability and certainty in capital sentencing decisions because the death penalty is uniquely severe and final
- “It is for the jury to decide whether the ‘facts’ that the defendant asserts in mitigation are true and, if so, whether they are to be regarded as mitigating factors.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lohr, Erickson, Royira, Quinn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.