Michigan Court of Appeals· 4/21/1987

People v. Taylor

Citations

406 N.W.2d 859
159 Mich. App. 468

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that prosecutorial noncompliance with a discovery order is an error of nonconstitutional magnitude
stating that a party cannot complain of nondisclosure where he or she authored the document and therefore had knowledge independent of discovery
stating that the defendant was not entitled to a remedy for the discovery violation because he knew about the letter, having written it, and so his knowledge was not dependent on discovery
rejecting the defendant’s assertion of error when the defendant had independent knowledge of the materials in question
finding “defendant was entitled to no remedy for the prosecutor’s nondisclosure of the letter in question since the -3- defendant, having written it himself, had knowledge of it independent of discovery.”
“In this case we find that defendant was entitled to no remedy for the prosecutor’s nondisclosure of the letter in question since the defendant, having written it himself, had knowledge of it independent of discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hood, Holbrook, Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

108 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.