Skip to main content
· 12/4/1978

People v. Stromblad

Citations

  • 383 N.E.2d 969
  • 74 Ill. 2d 35
  • 23 Ill. Dec. 98
  • 1978 Ill. LEXIS 376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding reversible error for failure to properly define “obscenity” in jury instructions
  • finding reversible error for failure to properly define “obscenity” in jury instructions
  • finding reversible error for failure to properly define “obscenity” in jury instructions
  • finding reversible error for failure to properly define “obscenity” injury instructions
  • where instruction error is in a definition essential to the jury’s assessment of defendant’s guilt or innocence, it is reversible error, and requires a new trial
  • where instruction error is in a definition essential to the jury’s assessment of defendant’s guilt or innocence, it is reversible error, and requires a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kluczynski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.