Skip to main content

People v. Ridens

Citations

  • 321 N.E.2d 264
  • 59 Ill. 2d 362
  • 1974 Ill. LEXIS 299

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the statutory definition of obscenity in section 11 — 20, which contained the phrases “ ‘appeal to the prurient interest,’ ” “ ‘shameful or morbid interest in nudity, sex or excretion,’ ” and “ ‘redeeming social value,’ ” was not unconstitutionally vague

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goldenhersh, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Ridens

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.