People v. Stremmel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a witness’s prior inconsistent statement to be admissible as substantive evidence where the witness acknowledged at trial having made the statement, but not the prior inconsistent statement that the witness could not recall having previously made
• “Although mere general characteristics of shoeprints, such as size, style, and brand name are seldom sufficient for identification purposes, they may give rise to reasonable inferences which tend to establish guilt or innocence.”
• discussing fixed-bin probability calculation method

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).