Skip to main content

People v. Johnson

Citations

  • 634 N.E.2d 1285
  • 262 Ill. App. 3d 565
  • 199 Ill. Dec. 931
  • 1994 Ill. App. LEXIS 875

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that a court may take judicial notice of DNA identification technology as an accepted scientific procedure based on prior rulings
  • observing that a court may take judicial notice of DNA identification technology as an accepted scientific procedure based on prior rulings
  • single course of conduct where multiple acts of sexual assault perpetrated on one victim at same location and in immediate succession
  • trial court appropriately relied on precedential case law to determine that the proffered DNA testimony was admissible and had no need to conduct a Frye hearing prior to making its decision on the admissibility of that evidence
  • trial court appropriately relied on precedential case law to determine that the proffered DNA testimony was admissible and had no need to conduct a Frye hearing prior to making its decision on the admissibility of that evidence
  • trial court appropriately relied on precedential case law to determine that the proffered DNA testimony was admissible and had no need to conduct a Frye hearing prior to making its decision on the admissibility of that evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steigmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.