Illinois Supreme Court· 4/4/1984

People v. Taylor

Citations

462 N.E.2d 478
101 Ill. 2d 377
78 Ill. Dec. 359
1984 Ill. LEXIS 268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the trial court should have granted the defendant’s motion to change venue based on the documented “unprecedented volume of publicity” combined with the jurors’ exposure to polygraph information, which was particularly persuasive and highly prejudicial
holding that the trial court should have granted the defendant's motion to change venue based on the documented \unprecedented volume of publicity\ combined with the jurors' exposure to polygraph information, which was particularly persuasive and highly prejudicial
knowledge of media reports regarding performance of “ clear [ed]” codefendant on a lie detector test tainted prospective jurors
knowledge of media reports regarding performance of \clear[ed]\ codefendant on a lie detector test tainted prospective jurors
polygraph examinations have no place in Illinois courts to prove either guilt or innocence
polygraph examinations have no place in Illinois courts to prove either guilt or innocence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.