People v. Stone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Tracking-dog evidence is admissible only after certain foundational requirements are met. In addition, there must be other corroborating evidence presented before identification based on tracking-dog evidence is sufficient to support a guilty verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Barnett
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1995-11-13· cited 98×
• Moore v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-14· cited 45×
• People v. Coulter
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1994-06-06· cited 42×
• People v. Crear
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2000-10-18· cited 28×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-01-16· cited 19×
• People v. Raby
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1998-02-05· cited 16×
• State v. Wang
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-06-17

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ake v. Oklahoma
  Supreme Court· 1985-02-26· cited 3,332×
• People v. Milbourn
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1990-09-11· cited 1,306×
• People v. Gonzales
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1992-03-16· cited 74×
• Ake v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1989-07-13· cited 62×
• Beaver v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1987-01-16· cited 62×
• State v. Indvik
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-02-20· cited 45×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1980-07-15· cited 41×
• Palmer v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1985-12-12· cited 41×
• Dunn v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1987-01-26· cited 32×
• People v. Laidlaw
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-06-06· cited 21×
• People v. Fisher
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-03-07· cited 12×
• People v. Markley
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-08-27· cited 7×
• People v. Crook
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1987-08-03· cited 5×