People v. Laidlaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that tracking-dog, alone, is insufficient to establish identity; “there must be other corroborating evidence presented before identification is sufficient to support a guilty verdict”
• “The need to establish an independent basis for an in-court identification arises where the pretrial identification is tainted by improper procedure or is unduly suggestive.”
• “The need to establish an independent basis for an in-court identification arises where the pretrial identification is tainted by improper procedure or is unduly suggestive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).