Skip to main content

Citations

  • 778 P.2d 460
  • 1989 OK CR 30
  • 1989 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 33
  • 1989 WL 78294

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the probative value of excluded reports “diminished” because the defense expert was able to testify about them
  • finding the probative value of excluded reports \diminished\ because the defense expert was able to testify about them
  • one-year delay between reversal of conviction and retrial did not constitute denial of speedy trial, because delay was largely due to defendant's hospitalization while undergoing testing to evaluate competency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parks, Lane, Bussey, Lumpkin, Brett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.