Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 7/13/1989
Ake v. State
Citations
- 778 P.2d 460
- 1989 OK CR 30
- 1989 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 33
- 1989 WL 78294
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the probative value of excluded reports “diminished” because the defense expert was able to testify about them
- finding the probative value of excluded reports \diminished\ because the defense expert was able to testify about them
- one-year delay between reversal of conviction and retrial did not constitute denial of speedy trial, because delay was largely due to defendant's hospitalization while undergoing testing to evaluate competency
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parks, Lane, Bussey, Lumpkin, Brett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Steven Keith Hatch v. State of OklahomaTenth Circuit· 1995-06-14· cited 263×
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-12-06· cited 138×
- Williamson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1991-05-15· cited 134×
- Bryson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-05-20· cited 125×
- McGregor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-12-06· cited 119×
- Cuesta-Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2010-10-12· cited 101×
- Duvall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1991-05-28· cited 100×
- State v. BarnettTennessee Supreme Court· 1995-11-13· cited 98×
- Salazar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1993-04-29· cited 94×
- Humphreys v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1997-10-10· cited 76×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1999-02-03· cited 74×
- McWilliams v. DunnSupreme Court· 2017-06-19· cited 71×
- Tibbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1991-10-24· cited 70×
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-01-10· cited 69×
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1998-12-10· cited 63×
- Williamson v. ReynoldsE.D. Oklahoma· 1995-09-19· cited 60×
- Plantz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-05-20· cited 56×
- Shelton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1990-05-24· cited 56×
- Lambert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-12-28· cited 51×
- Banks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1991-04-19· cited 45×
Cites
49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1985-02-26· cited 3,332×
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court· 1986-04-01· cited 1,418×
- Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court· 1985-12-10· cited 1,260×
- Kuhlmann v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 1,205×
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court· 1966-02-23· cited 1,196×
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court· 1952-10-13· cited 1,010×
- David W. McKay v. TexasSupreme Court· 1986-10-06· cited 757×
- Walker v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1986-12-01· cited 387×
- United States v. BledsoeEighth Circuit· 1982-03-12· cited 236×
- State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court· 1981-07-09· cited 175×
- Habib v. Raytheon Co.Supreme Court· 1982-11-29· cited 161×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1986-07-22· cited 151×
- Brogie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1985-01-02· cited 111×
- United States v. Darrell Eugene LawsonSeventh Circuit· 1981-07-09· cited 103×
- United States v. Scott A. FountainSeventh Circuit· 1988-05-16· cited 80×
- DeBolt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-07-16· cited 80×
- Brewer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1986-04-18· cited 76×
- State v. HaislipSupreme Court of Kansas· 1985-06-21· cited 74×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.