Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/10/2010

People v. Stewart

Citations

940 N.E.2d 273
406 Ill. App. 3d 518
346 Ill. Dec. 273
2010 Ill. App. LEXIS 1309

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding the defendant was not prejudiced by the failure to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense because the evidence supporting the defendant’s greater offense was so strong
no de novo review where defendant challenged \the inferences that can be drawn from the evidence\ by claiming the evidence failed to establish he acted \knowingly\
no de novo review where defendant challenged “the inferences that can be drawn from the evidence” by claiming the evidence failed to establish he acted “knowingly”
no de novo review where defendant challenged “inferences that can be drawn from the evidence” by claiming evidence failed to establish he acted “knowingly”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McBride, Garcia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.