Supreme Court of Colorado· 8/25/1980

People v. Spies

Citations

615 P.2d 710
200 Colo. 434
1980 Colo. LEXIS 709

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that whether a defendant has standing to contest a search depends on whether the state has violated his or her legitimate expectation of privacy
remanding interlocutory case for further development of record when trial court did not make factual findings necessary to determine whether defendant had standing and evidence in the record was conflicting
finding remand appropriate in interlocutory appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lohr, Quinn, Erickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Spies

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

People v. Spies
Appellate Court of Illinois· 1930-12-22

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.