People v. Sowell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Laws imposing registration requirements on sex offenders [are] . . . not punishment . . . .”
• “Nor does modification of this requirement from an indefinite to a lifelong duty to register transform [sex offender] registration into a punishment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• in Interest of T.B
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2019-06-20· cited 5×
• Peo in Int of C.M.D
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2018-12-13· cited 2×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. District Court, Second Judicial District
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1986-01-31· cited 457×
• Ficarra v. Department of Regulatory Agencies, Division of Insurance
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1993-03-22· cited 95×
• Specialty Restaurants Corp. v. Nelson
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2010-05-10· cited 69×
• People v. D.K.B.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1993-01-11· cited 57×
• People v. Fisher
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1983-01-24· cited 54×
• People v. Summers
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2009-05-26· cited 54×
• People v. Platt
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2004-01-12· cited 42×
• Shell Western E&P, Inc. v. Dolores County Board of Commissioners
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1997-12-15· cited 39×
• People v. MacRander
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1988-03-28· cited 38×
• People v. Tuffo
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2009-04-30· cited 36×
• Gasper v. Gunter
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1993-05-10· cited 32×
• People v. Stead
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2002-08-15· cited 32×
• City & County of Denver v. Rinker
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1961-11-27· cited 29×
• Jamison v. People
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1999-04-01· cited 26×
• People v. Atencio
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2009-06-11· cited 11×