Supreme Court of Colorado· 3/28/1988
People v. MacRander
Citations
- 756 P.2d 356
- 12 Brief Times Rptr. 492
- 1988 Colo. LEXIS 40
- 1988 WL 25114
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “a defendant’s detrimental reliance need not implicate constitutional rights”
- holding that “a defendant’s detrimental reliance need not implicate constitutional rights”
- “A prosecutor should not fail to comply with a plea agreement, unless a defendant fails to comply ... or other extenuating circumstances are present.”
- “[W]e focus on the meaning a reasonable person might attach to the language of the agreement.”
- \ [W] e focus on the meaning a reasonable person might attach to the language of the agreement.\
- as a matter of due process, governmental promises, such as those made in plea negotiations, are enforceable to the extent that a defendant detrimentally relied on them
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rovira
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1999-10-04· cited 315×
- St. James v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1997-12-08· cited 214×
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-06-14· cited 100×
- State v. WackerNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-11-05· cited 37×
- People v. MelaraColorado Court of Appeals· 2025-05-15· cited 32×
- State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 30×
- People v. CareyColorado Court of Appeals· 2008-04-17· cited 25×
- People v. HarrisColorado Court of Appeals· 1995-06-29· cited 24×
- People v. GarciaColorado Court of Appeals· 2007-05-03· cited 22×
- People v. McCormickSupreme Court of Colorado· 1993-10-25· cited 21×
- In re People v. Subjack & No. 20SA283, In re People v. LynchSupreme Court of Colorado· 2021-02-08· cited 8×
- People v. McCormickColorado Court of Appeals· 1992-10-26· cited 7×
- People v. ElsbachColorado Court of Appeals· 1997-01-09· cited 6×
- People v. NichelsonSupreme Court of Colorado· 2009-11-09· cited 6×
- In Re: The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. David SUBJACK, In Re: The People of the State of Colorado v. Darryl Lewis LynchSupreme Court of Colorado· 2021-02-08· cited 6×
- People v. EspinozaColorado Court of Appeals· 1999-10-04· cited 5×
- People v. SandersColorado Court of Appeals· 2009-10-15· cited 5×
- People v. FrazierColorado Court of Appeals· 1994-09-08· cited 4×
- Watkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-10-14· cited 4×
- People v. NguyenColorado Court of Appeals· 2003-08-28· cited 3×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 4,350×
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 1,007×
- Ralph Henry Cooper v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1979-03-05· cited 185×
- United States v. Peter A. Crusco and Phillip A. Cimmino. Appeal of Phillip CimminoThird Circuit· 1976-05-27· cited 176×
- United States v. Park Hung QuanNinth Circuit· 1986-05-08· cited 80×
- In Re William Bruce ArnettEleventh Circuit· 1986-11-07· cited 80×
- People v. FisherSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-01-24· cited 54×
- Rex v. SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado· 1978-02-21· cited 23×
- People Ex Rel. Farina v. DISTRICT COURT OF 21ST JDSupreme Court of Colorado· 1974-04-08· cited 21×
- Lucero v. District Court of Twelfth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1975-03-13· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.