People v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• victim’s testimony referring to “ ‘pictures’ ” in the plural, but describing only one occasion during which photographs were taken, insufficient to convict on four counts of child sexual abuse
• victim's testimony referring to \ 'pictures' \ in the plural, but describing only one occasion during which photographs were taken, insufficient to convict on four counts of child sexual abuse
• “[T]he expert is allowed to testify concerning whether particular conduct by the victim is consistent with having been abused to rebut an inference that the conduct is inconsistent with abuse.”
• “[T]he expert is allowed to testify concerning whether particular conduct by the victim is consistent with having been abused to rebut an inference that the conduct is inconsistent with abuse.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Bailey
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2015-06-02· cited 235×
• People v. Harmon
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2002-02-25· cited 84×
• People v. Letcher
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-10-24· cited 35×
• People v. Hack
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1996-12-09· cited 32×
• People v. Riggs
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2000-01-10· cited 12×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Hampton
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1979-11-26· cited 474×
• People v. Beckley
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1990-06-05· cited 182×
• People v. Vaughn
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1990-12-05· cited 64×