People v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that because the district attorney’s acts were valid, defendant’s challenge to the district attorney’s prosecutorial authority did not raise an issue of subject matter jurisdiction
• determining that because the district attorney’s acts were valid, defendant’s challenge to the district attorney’s prosecutorial authority did not raise an issue of subject matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• v. Hamm
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2019-06-20· cited 525×
• v. Thompson
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2020-08-03· cited 45×
• People v. Stanley
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2007-04-05· cited 24×
• State v. Surratt
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2015-12-10· cited 5×
• Michael Anthony Crockett v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-07-24· cited 4×
• Leske v. Golder
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2005-05-05· cited 4×
• v. Medina
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2019-07-03

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Eppens
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1999-04-26· cited 556×
• Patton v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2001-11-13· cited 259×
• People v. Hartkemeyer
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1992-07-02· cited 27×
• People v. Montoya
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1980-05-22· cited 21×
• People ex rel. Callaway v. De Guelle
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1909-09-15· cited 16×
• People v. Joseph
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1995-12-07· cited 14×
• People v. Quimby
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1963-05-06· cited 10×
• Glavino v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1924-03-03· cited 4×