Colorado Court of Appeals· 5/5/2005
Leske v. Golder
Citations
- 124 P.3d 863
- 2005 Colo. App. LEXIS 676
- 2005 WL 1038971
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A defendant is prohibited from using a proceeding under Crim. P. 35(c) to relitigate issues fully and finally resolved in an earlier appeal.”
- “Crim. P. 35(c) motions are not intended to provide perpetual review of criminal convictions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ney, Davidson, Taubman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado· 1996-04-15· cited 1,618×
- DePineda v. PriceSupreme Court of Colorado· 1996-04-15· cited 373×
- People v. LeskeSupreme Court of Colorado· 1998-04-13· cited 371×
- People v. HolmesSupreme Court of Colorado· 1998-05-26· cited 62×
- Duran v. PriceSupreme Court of Colorado· 1994-01-10· cited 48×
- People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1981-12-14· cited 16×
- People v. ScottColorado Court of Appeals· 2005-02-03· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.