Skip to main content

Leske v. Golder

Citations

  • 124 P.3d 863
  • 2005 Colo. App. LEXIS 676
  • 2005 WL 1038971

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A defendant is prohibited from using a proceeding under Crim. P. 35(c) to relitigate issues fully and finally resolved in an earlier appeal.”
  • “Crim. P. 35(c) motions are not intended to provide perpetual review of criminal convictions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ney, Davidson, Taubman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.