Skip to main content
· 9/7/2006

In Re Marriage of Alexander

Citations

  • 857 N.E.2d 766
  • 368 Ill. App. 3d 192
  • 306 Ill. Dec. 367
  • 2006 Ill. App. LEXIS 836

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that error in valuation of property was de minimis and did not require reversal
  • when an expert opinion is derived solely based upon observation and experience, that opinion is generally not considered scientific evidence subject to the Frye test
  • when an expert opinion is derived solely based upon observation and experience, that opinion is generally not considered scientific evidence subject to the Frye test
  • valuation error did not warrant reversal, in part, because “James failed to raise this argument in a posttrial motion to allow the circuit court to address and correct the error.”
  • error in valuation of property was de minimus
  • error in valuation of property was de minimus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Welch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.