Skip to main content
· 11/12/2019

People v. Schnoor

Citations

  • 2019 IL App (4th) 170571

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an issue was abandoned because it was raised for the first and only time by the dissent
  • holding that an individual was a victim under OV 9 because “the person near the woman when the perpetrator stole her purse was placed in danger of injury or loss of life by the armed robbery”
  • explaining that it is erroneous to consider “the entire criminal transaction” when “scoring OV 9”
  • stating that “offense variables are scored by reference only to the sentencing offense, except where specifically provided otherwise”
  • explaining that it is erroneous to consider “the entire criminal transaction” when “scoring OV 9”
  • explaining that a defendant is entitled to be sentenced on the basis of accurate information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.