· 11/12/2019
People v. Schnoor
Citations
- 2019 IL App (4th) 170571
Oral argument
- ListenArgued27 min recording
Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an issue was abandoned because it was raised for the first and only time by the dissent
- holding that an individual was a victim under OV 9 because “the person near the woman when the perpetrator stole her purse was placed in danger of injury or loss of life by the armed robbery”
- explaining that it is erroneous to consider “the entire criminal transaction” when “scoring OV 9”
- stating that “offense variables are scored by reference only to the sentencing offense, except where specifically provided otherwise”
- explaining that it is erroneous to consider “the entire criminal transaction” when “scoring OV 9”
- explaining that a defendant is entitled to be sentenced on the basis of accurate information
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.