People v. Contorno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that the trial court may have made an independent determination of fitness but that the record did not affirmatively show that
• acknowledging that the trial court may have made an independent determination of fitness but that the record did not affirmatively show that
• adding that fitness cannot be based solely on \a stipulation to the existence of psychiatric conclusions or findings\ (emphasis added)
• “Defense counsel moved for a fitness examination, and the court found that a bona fide doubt existed regarding defendant’s fitness.”
• “The ultimate decision as to a defendant’s fitness must be made by the trial court, not the experts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).