Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/17/1999
People v. Savory
Citations
- 722 N.E.2d 220
- 309 Ill. App. 3d 408
- 242 Ill. Dec. 731
- 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 881
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding de novo review appropriate where the trial court’s decision is based on the pleadings and a review of the transcripts, as opposed to witness credibility
- holding de novo review appropri ate where the trial court's decision is based on the pleadings and a review of the transcripts, as opposed to witness credibil ity
- addressing the statutory standard applicable to a postjudgment motion for DNA testing
- “The appealability of an order is determined by its substance, not its form.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lytton, Holdridge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court· 2020-06-18· cited 495×
- People v. SavoryIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-05-24· cited 126×
- People v. CollierAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-12-19· cited 79×
- People v. BarnslaterAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-05-04· cited 73×
- In re PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2009-05-13· cited 62×
- People v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-05-05· cited 49×
- People v. UriosteAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-09-21· cited 49×
- People v. HockenberryAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-10-13· cited 43×
- People v. RokitaAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-09-08· cited 40×
- People v. HendersonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-09-25· cited 36×
- People v. JurisecIllinois Supreme Court· 2002-02-22· cited 34×
- People v. FieldsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-09-30· cited 34×
- People v. WoodsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-08-03· cited 28×
- People v. JarrettAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-03-18· cited 27×
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-08-24· cited 22×
- People v. StevensAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-08-03· cited 20×
- People v. WallaceAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-12-18· cited 18×
- People v. EvansAppellate Court of Illinois· 2017-09-18· cited 16×
- People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois· 2018-02-05· cited 13×
- People v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2021-12-22· cited 12×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court· 1991-04-16· cited 3,331×
- Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 1,925×
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-10-01· cited 1,609×
- People v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-04-18· cited 364×
- People v. FriebergIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-03-12· cited 332×
- People v. BryantIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-05-17· cited 237×
- Branson v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-11-30· cited 230×
- Kahle v. John Deere Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1984-11-30· cited 124×
- People v. PopeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1996-11-15· cited 74×
- American Country Ins. Co. v. Kraemer Bros., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-08-06· cited 55×
- People v. DunnAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-06-22· cited 23×
- Department of Transportation v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-02-05· cited 21×
- Branch v. European Autohaus, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-06-22· cited 18×
- City of East Peoria v. Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois· 1983-08-23· cited 16×
- People v. GholstonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1998-06-22· cited 14×
- Thorson v. La Salle National BankingAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-03-12· cited 10×
- Cremer v. City of MacOmb Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois· 1996-06-03· cited 9×
- In re Marriage of WaltersAppellate Court of Illinois· 1985-01-09· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.