Skip to main content

People v. Savory

Citations

  • 722 N.E.2d 220
  • 309 Ill. App. 3d 408
  • 242 Ill. Dec. 731
  • 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding de novo review appropriate where the trial court’s decision is based on the pleadings and a review of the transcripts, as opposed to witness credibility
  • holding de novo review appropri ate where the trial court's decision is based on the pleadings and a review of the transcripts, as opposed to witness credibil ity
  • addressing the statutory standard applicable to a postjudgment motion for DNA testing
  • “The appealability of an order is determined by its substance, not its form.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lytton, Holdridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.