American Country Ins. Co. v. Kraemer Bros., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that “coverage was illusory because it is difficult to imagine any factual scenario” in which the provision in question would apply, reasoning that coverage is not “illusory” under Illinois law merely because the covered circumstances are uncommon
• where the certificate of insurance contains a disclaimer, the insured may not rely on the certificate but must look to the policy itself to determine the scope of coverage
• where the certificate of insurance contains a disclaimer, the insured may not rely on the certificate but must look to the policy itself to determine the scope of coverage
• “If [a] certificate includes a disclaimer, the insured may not rely on representations made in the certificate but must look to the policy itself to determine the scope of coverage.”
• “If [a] certificate includes a disclaimer, the insured may not rely on representations made in the certificate but must look to the policy itself to determine the scope of coverage.”
• “If [a] certificate includes a disclaimer, the insured may not rely on representations made in the certificate but must look to the policy itself to determine the scope of coverage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).