Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/18/2010

People v. Jarrett

Citations

399 Ill. App. 3d 715
927 N.E.2d 754
340 Ill. Dec. 15
2010 Ill. App. LEXIS 214

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “evidence is not ‘newly discovered’ when it presents facts already known to a defendant at or prior to trial”
holding that facts known to the defendant prior to trial do not constitute newly discovered evidence merely because the defendant was not aware of potential witnesses
finding the undisclosed evidence was not material where the evidence - 23 - 1-16-1797 demonstrated the defendant and his codefendant were the initial aggressors and did not act in self-defense
where affidavits did not dispute that codefendant fired the first shots, they did not support successive postconviction claim of self-defense and were not of conclusive character
“evidence is not ‘newly discovered’ when it presents facts already known to a defendant at or prior to trial, even if the source of these facts may have been unknown, unavailable, or uncooperative”
“evidence is not ‘newly discovered’ when it presents facts already known to a defendant at or prior to trial, even if the source of these facts may have been unknown, unavailable, or uncooperative”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frossard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.