Supreme Court of Colorado· 3/31/1997
People v. Sapp
Citations
- 934 P.2d 1367
- 12 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1268
- 1997 Colo. LEXIS 266
- 1997 WL 143806
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- involving a Crim. P. 37.1(a) interlocutory appeal taken in response to a ruling suppressing the defendants' statements as \involuntary and in violation of Miranda \
- \In order for such a belief to be objectively reasonable the belief must result from some significant coercive action of the state. The action of the state must be more coercive than that resulting from the general obligation imposed on a witness to give truthful testimony.\
- \In order for such a belief to be objectively reasonable the belief must result from some significant coercive action of the state. The action of the state must be more coercive than that resulting from the general obligation imposed on a witness to give truthful testimony.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martinez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Gideon (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-31· cited 73×
- State v. Gideon (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-15· cited 43×
- State v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court· 2013-05-29· cited 24×
- State v. AikenSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-06-04· cited 13×
- State v. ChavarriaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-10-02· cited 12×
- People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado· 2019-06-10· cited 11×
- Hopp & Flesch, LLC v. BackstreetSupreme Court of Colorado· 2005-12-19· cited 10×
- State v. StinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-06-26· cited 9×
- People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-04-01· cited 6×
- City and County of Denver v. PowellColorado Court of Appeals· 1998-11-13· cited 5×
- State v. GideonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-24· cited 5×
- Backstreet v. Hopp & Flesch, LLCColorado Court of Appeals· 2005-02-22· cited 4×
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-05-04· cited 4×
- State v. AikenCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-11-06· cited 2×
- State v. WelchmanNebraska Supreme Court· 2015-12-04· cited 2×
- State v. SocarrasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-04-10· cited 2×
- Khristina Phillips v. The People of the State of Colorado.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2026-04-06· cited 1×
- People v. HaleasAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-10-13
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 1,569×
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1967-01-23· cited 1,543×
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court· 1973-11-19· cited 1,102×
- Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 696×
- Lefkowitz v. CunninghamSupreme Court· 1977-06-13· cited 598×
- Uniformed Sanitation Men Ass'n v. Commissioner of Sanitation of New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 436×
- United States v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1977-05-23· cited 408×
- United States v. Mario E. IndoratoFirst Circuit· 1980-08-21· cited 87×
- United States v. Robert S. FriedrickD.C. Circuit· 1988-03-11· cited 64×
- United States v. CamachoS.D. Florida· 1990-05-25· cited 29×
- State v. ConnorIdaho Supreme Court· 1993-07-09· cited 22×
- Cooper v. Civil Service CommissionColorado Court of Appeals· 1979-11-29· cited 17×
- State v. LacailladeNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-07-28· cited 11×
- United States v. NajarianD. Minnesota· 1996-01-12· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.