Skip to main content
· 8/21/1980

United States v. Mario E. Indorato

Citations

  • 628 F.2d 711
  • 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14658

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no coercion by similar insubordination statute where there was no evidence on the record that statute punishing insubordination would be applied to punish an employee who elects to invoke the Fifth Amendment
  • fear of punishment as a result of invoking the Fifth Amendment does not protect against subsequent use of self-incriminating statements at a criminal trial
  • \[W]e have indicated our uneasiness with this phraseology and pointed out that it has been the subject of mixed reviews.\
  • Garrity inapplicable where threat of termination was not explicit
  • describing the “two common features” of a Garrity violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffin, Campbell, Bownes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.