· 8/21/1980
United States v. Mario E. Indorato
Citations
- 628 F.2d 711
- 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14658
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no coercion by similar insubordination statute where there was no evidence on the record that statute punishing insubordination would be applied to punish an employee who elects to invoke the Fifth Amendment
- fear of punishment as a result of invoking the Fifth Amendment does not protect against subsequent use of self-incriminating statements at a criminal trial
- \[W]e have indicated our uneasiness with this phraseology and pointed out that it has been the subject of mixed reviews.\
- Garrity inapplicable where threat of termination was not explicit
- describing the “two common features” of a Garrity violation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffin, Campbell, Bownes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.