California Court of Appeal· 3/28/2001
People v. Salgado
Citations
- 88 Cal. App. 4th 5
- 105 Cal. Rptr. 2d 373
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2555
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 3121
- 2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 238
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Aiding and abetting requires a person to promote, encourage or instigate 42 AMADO V. GONZALEZ the crime with knowledge of its unlawful purpose.”
- “Aiding and abetting requires a person to promote, encourage or instigate the crime with knowledge of its unlawful purpose.”
- holding retaliation claim requires showing of \causal link\ between 16 \protected activity\ and \adverse employment action\; noting, \[e]ssential to a causal link 17 is evidence that the employer was aware that the plaintiff had engaged in the protected 18 activity\
- “Aiding and abetting requires a person to promote, encourage or instigate the crime with knowledge of its unlawful purpose.”
- “Aiding and abetting requires a person to promote, encourage or instigate the crime with knowledge of its unlawful purpose.”
- “Aiding and abetting requires a person to promote, encourage or instigate 42 AMADO V. GONZALEZ the crime with knowledge of its unlawful purpose.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Perren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Randall Amado v. Terri GonzalezNinth Circuit· 2014-07-11· cited 102×
- People v. EroshevichCalifornia Supreme Court· 2014-11-03· cited 51×
- People v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-12-04· cited 43×
- People v. PedrozaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-11-14· cited 30×
- Gregory Brown v. M. AtchleyNinth Circuit· 2023-08-03· cited 30×
- People v. SpicerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-04-17· cited 17×
- Randall Amado v. Terri GonzalezNinth Circuit· 2013-10-30· cited 9×
- People v. SamplesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-02-25· cited 4×
- People v. HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-02-10
- People v. SaibuCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-07-26
- People v. Super. Ct. (Woodward)California Court of Appeal· 2024-03-14
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-02-09· cited 10,035×
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 4,912×
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,075×
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-02-29· cited 2,018×
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 1,668×
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 1,657×
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court· 1977-04-04· cited 1,460×
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1975-02-25· cited 1,334×
- Hudson v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1981-02-24· cited 769×
- People v. BeemanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-02-06· cited 766×
- People v. ZapienCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-03-04· cited 691×
- People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1983-03-17· cited 627×
- People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-11-30· cited 476×
- United States v. JenkinsSupreme Court· 1975-02-25· cited 369×
- People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-04-04· cited 285×
- People v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-05-27· cited 208×
- People v. NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1993-12-28· cited 201×
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court· 1983-03-21· cited 190×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.