Illinois Supreme Court· 11/18/2004

People v. Rosenberg

Citations

820 N.E.2d 440
213 Ill. 2d 69
289 Ill. Dec. 664
2004 Ill. LEXIS 1671

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that whether one has a legitimate expectation of privacy in an area searched is measured by an objective standard drawn from common experience
noting that whether one has a legitimate expectation of privacy in an area searched is measured by an objective standard drawn from common experience
noting that the circuit court's ruling on a motion to suppress remains subject to change until final judgment
a defendant’s testimony at a suppression hearing can be used for impeachment if the defendant testifies at trial
“It is the defendant’s burden to establish that he had a legitimate expectation of privacy that was violated by the challenged search.”
“[A] defendant seeking to claim the protections of the fourth amendment must demonstrate that he or she personally has an expectation of privacy in the place searched and that his or her expectation is reasonable.” (Emphasis in original.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Rosenberg

34 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.