People v. Rosenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• re-jecting claim that efforts to collect a legally enforceable debt fall outside the scope of the criminal extortion statute: \If the appellants honestly believed that they were entitled to payment ... they should have availed themselves of appropriate civil remedies.\
• where same seetion of statute proscribed several different types of conduct, defendant lacked standing to assert facial overbreadth challenge based on statutory conduct with which he was neither charged nor convicted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Fuller
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1990-07-09· cited 152×
• People v. Harris
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1981-06-18· cited 25×
• People v. American Health Care, Inc.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1979-02-22· cited 18×
• People v. Tumbarello
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1981-02-02· cited 17×
• People v. Hodges
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1981-02-09· cited 13×
• People v. Laurent
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2008-07-24· cited 5×
• The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Douglas Burt FULLER
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1990-05-21

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Bennett
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1973-10-29· cited 521×
• People v. Marques
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1974-03-11· cited 63×
• People v. Vigil
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1972-11-06· cited 25×
• People v. Sharpe
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1973-10-09· cited 22×
• State v. Richards
  Washington Supreme Court· 1917-08-13· cited 19×
• People v. Bueno
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1975-05-12· cited 14×
• Garcia v. City of Pueblo
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1971-10-04· cited 6×