Skip to main content

People v. Roberson

Citations

  • 367 Ill. App. 3d 193
  • 854 N.E.2d 317
  • 304 Ill. Dec. 975
  • 2006 Ill. App. LEXIS 802

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a defendant’s privacy interests are not offended by a warrant check, because the existence of an arrest warrant is a matter of public record
  • a defendant's privacy interests are not offended by a warrant check, because the existence of an arrest warrant is a matter of public record
  • “the defendant must convince the trial court that the *** seizure was unlawful”
  • warrant check permissible even though it exceeded scope of the stop, because it did not cause detention to last longer than reasonably necessary for traffic stop or infringe on a legitimate privacy interest of defendant
  • applying burden-shifting analysis to a motion to suppress evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Appleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.