Skip to main content

People v. Edwards

Citations

  • 383 N.E.2d 944
  • 74 Ill. 2d 1
  • 23 Ill. Dec. 73
  • 1978 Ill. LEXIS 372

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[w]here the record is insufficient or does not demonstrate thé alleged error, the reviewing court must refrain from supposition and decide accordingly”
  • when a record is incomplete, a reviewing court \may not guess * * * or hypothesize\
  • when a record is incomplete, a reviewing court “may not guess *** or hypothesize”
  • prosecutor's repeated references to excluded clothing despite objections by defense counsel being sustained went \far beyond the usual legitimate inferences from facts proved in the trial\ and denied the defendant a fair trial
  • prosecutor’s repeated references to excluded clothing despite objections by defense counsel being sustained went “far beyond the usual legitimate inferences from facts proved in the trial” and denied the defendant a fair trial
  • “A reviewing court may not guess at the harm to an appellant *** where a record is incomplete. *** Where the record is insufficient or does not demonstrate the alleged error, the reviewing court must refrain from supposition and decide accordingly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Goldenhersh, Kluczynski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.